Motor racing prepares for the future with technical enhancements

As the 2017 Formula One season starts to take shape with the sport’s stakeholders thrashing out the technical regulations, on the broadcasting side movement continues to be made in both Formula 1 and beyond.

Changes are coming…
There will be two significant changes in 2017 for viewers watching Formula 1. For the first time ever, Formula 1 will be broadcast in 4k resolution (Ultra HD) from 2017. The news was announced at the time of Sky’s new rights deal back in March. It is not the first time a motor sport event has been broadcast in 4k: BT Sport aired the British MotoGP last season in ultra HD. The 2017 announcement with relation to Formula 1 has not yet been mentioned via any of Formula One Management’s (FOM) outlets, namely their website or social media channels.

Despite this, as the Sky press release mentioned every race will air live in 4K next year. It will be interesting to see how much demand there is for 4K content. FOM’s current circuit cameras are configured for 4K, meaning that there will be only World Feed. In comparison, BT Sport usually have two commentary teams for the events they air in ultra HD, the British MotoGP was one example of this last year.

2016 Russian GP - Magnussen on-board
On-board with Renault’s Kevin Magnussen at the 2016 Russian Grand Prix. Just how different may the t-cam angle look in 2017?

The second major change that will be noticed worldwide is the change to the T-camera. Probably the most well-known and used on-board camera, the introduction of a cockpit protection system (Halo, Aeroscreen or something else) means that the perspective this camera gives will be radically different. Unfortunately, we did not see any on-board cameras from Daniel Ricciardo’s car during his Aeroscreen demonstration during practice one at the Russian Grand Prix, but I’m hopeful we will see on-board shots in forthcoming races.

An Aeroscreen like solution does provide opportunities to bring in new camera angles. The most logical one is a camera looking back towards the driver, which should be closer than ever before. If you wanted to be clever, you could have a camera embedded within the Aeroscreen that rotates around the top rim. I’m sure there’s many more, but if Aeroscreen was made mandatory, there certainly are a lot of ways that FOM could try to use the system to get closer to the driver in the future.

…say hello to drones and virtual reality…
Before the 2017 season gets underway though, there is at least one new innovation we will see in Formula 1 this year. According to Joe Saward, the Italian Grand Prix will play host to drones, with the hope that it will “create better coverage”. I’m intrigued to see how this goes, although there are some very obvious safety aspects to take into account, as Saward himself mentions in the link above.

Elsewhere, 360 degree videos and virtual reality is the thing doing the rounds at the moment, in both Formula 1 and Formula E. 360 degree videos are not new though, and in fact have been around for several years, dating back to at least 2012. Nevertheless, Formula E has managed to get the jump on Formula 1 by offering 360 degree highlights of races from a selection of on-board camera angles. To my knowledge, we have not yet had 360 degree videos during an F1 race weekend, the closest we have come so far is this video from Sky’s virtual reality studio that was released in March.

Alongside Formula E’s 360-degree movement is the announcement that was made in March that the series has teamed up with Virtually Live, with the intention to broadcast races live in virtual reality in the near future. Virtually Live’s CEO Tom Impallomeni said: “Formula E aims to represent a vision for the future of the motor industry, serving as a framework for R&D around the electric vehicle, while Virtually Live is building a revolutionary, immersive virtual reality technology allowing everyone to experience the magic of live sports and events from anywhere in the world.”

…FOM and Dorna roll out new graphics
There have been some subtle graphical changes rolled out this season so far from FOM. Ignoring the elimination qualifying ‘countdown’ graphic that we will hopefully never see again, the main changes are around pit stops and tyre choices. The pit stop graphic is the most effective change, with added detail compared with 2015. There is more emphasis on tyre choices, which are embedded within the pit stop strip, as well as the stint length that the tyre lasted.

2015 vs 2016 F1 pit graphics.png
A comparison of Formula One Management’s 2015 (top) and 2016 (bottom) pit stops graphics.

The tyre graphics as a whole have been tweaked out of necessity for the new tyre rules for the 2016 Formula One season. With three tyre compounds available, it means six possible options are available (new and used). FOM use a filled-in tyre to show that it is a new tyre at the start of the stint. An unfilled tyre, like the graphic above shows, means that some laps had already been completed on that tyre before the current stint started – in the case above with Hamilton, this would have been during qualifying.

I understand why FOM may have wanted to add the new and used aspect to the graphics, but, is the graphic useful if it has to be explained to casual viewers at every race? I’m not so certain. After a few laps a tyre is no longer new. This feels like over complexity to a degree. I like the graphic, I just wonder whether it was necessary though in the first place.

ESPN have taken a page out of FOM’s book with their new IndyCar graphics for the 2016 season. The graphics, only available to domestic viewers when ESPN are covering the action live, can be seen here. The graphic set uses a similar layout to historical IndyCar graphics but with a modern, flat look, bearing similarities to the graphics Formula 1 introduced at the beginning of 2015.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Motor racing prepares for the future with technical enhancements

  1. FOM haven’t exactly been the forerunners when it comes to new technology. It took years for the rotating onboard camera to appear before it was quickly put back in the cupboard.
    I presume they are considering using drones because they are significantly cheaper than Spidercams – forget the viewer just go for the cheapest.

  2. Indycar have been using the same graphics this season as the countless seasons before and they’re crap… I hate them with a passion… I’m also curious as to why the feed isn’t even in stereo sound as well.. Yes I have noticed 😉

  3. The new pitstop graphics are too cluttered in my opinion. I find it a bit cumbersome to decipher without distracting me too much from the racing. I think it’s because of the fact that it’s all laid out in a single line.

    I would prefer if they go back to last year’s “box” layout and make it taller to add more lines to accommodate the extra information.

    • I disagree that there’s any problem with these new graphics – I think all the new pit stop and tyre information is great.

      In the past I’ve complained because we didn’t get all that information, but it seemed commentators had it via some source – so for example they might mention during a pit stop that the driver was putting on a scrub set of tyres, but more often they didn’t.

      I’ve had no problem reading the new graphics, I think they’re well designed. I watched Russia on my very average laptop, but could still read and comprehend all the interesting new tyre, pit stop and strategy graphics very clearly.

      It would be even better if there was an F1 app that allowed you to see more tyre and strategy information on a second screen. For example, I’d like to know exactly what tyres each driver has left at any part of a race weekend, plus how many laps used sets have done, and also what tyres each driver handed back during / after free practice sessions. It could also offer insight from Pirelli about strategies, as well as lots of other interesting technical data.

      Why should the sport pander to the lowest common denominator by dumbing-down the presentation?

      • I agree the new information is great; my suggestion was that it is rearranged rather than removed.

        Anyway, if I’m in a very small minority then that’s all well and good.

  4. I’ve don’t understand why a separate commentary team is required for anything in 4k. In fact I am certain there is not technical reason for this. It’s just a separate audio track so it doesn’t matter.

    All that will happen, presumably, is that FOM will provide the world feed in 4k, and it’s then split into discrete feeds that Sky etc can select for each channel offing – one that’s native 4k, and another that’s down-scaled into HD, and possibly a third that’s downscaled into SD.

  5. One thought on the drones is that they are already been used for the WRC, so the FIA must be OK with them on safety grounds.

  6. 4K? Currently a waste of money for the average home. How about FOM getting better content before any other changes.

    http://tinyurl.com/jfaeuhk Worth reading if you are in the market for a new TV, or even tempted to think that you might be ‘upgrading’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s